|
|
|  |
|
| John Deere Replacement Parts: Blades |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Why buy John Deere replacement blades? Application-specific design |
 |
|
| Comparison is of John Deere blades against comparable competitive blades (blades not manufactured by John Deere, but sold to fit the same equipment). |
|
| Stake Test Results: |
 |
 |
| Competitive Blade Fragments |
| |
John Deere Original Equipment Rotary Mower Blade |
|
| Blade Comparisons: |
|
| Features |
John Deere Rotary Blade |
Competitive Blade |
| Trueness to Engineering Specifications |
|
|
| Size of center hole: |
Perfectly sized to spindle alignment boss. |
Center hole too large leads to moderate blade and deck vibration. |
|
| Location of center hole: |
Hole is located in exact center of blade. |
Mislocated center holes leads to serious vibration and blade-to-blade contact. |
|
| Flatness of blade/spindle contact area: |
Blade remains flat while tightening blade bolt. |
As blade is tightened, ends do not remain flat and blades become misaligned. |
|
| Material and Heat Treatment |
Combines carbon with boron and other materials to provide hardenability for long life without brittleness. |
Some competitive companies sell hardness only, compromising safety with brittle blades. Others don't control the material or heat-treating process, resulting in blades that are too soft and wear quickly or are too hard and brittle. |
|
| Rigorous Testing |
|
|
| Fatigue Test: |
Blades shaken over 6 million cycles to simulate abusive environment. |
|
|
| Stake Test: |
Blade approaches 200 mph, then encounters 1-inch steel rod. Blade must BEND, not fragment (see results above). |
Aftermarket blade fragments in stake test. (See results above) |
|
| Field Test: |
All new blades are tested at field test sites in Wisconsin and Florida for wear and longevity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
